ReviewNutrients2026
Best Practice Recommendations for the Assessment, Prevention and Treatment of Vitamin D Deficiency in Türkiye: A 2026 Update in a Setting with Limited Mandatory Food Fortification.
Review in Nutrients, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVitamin D deficiency is a common global health problem and remains highly prevalent in Türkiye, where limited food fortification and heterogeneous clinical practices contribute to variability in testing and supplementation strategies.
aimsTo provide Türkiye-specific best practice recommendations for defining clinically relevant serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] thresholds, identifying adult risk groups for targeted testing, and recommending evidence-based prevention, treatment, and monitoring approaches while minimizing under-treatment and inappropriate high-dose use.
methodsThis national expert consensus document was developed by endocrinologists from across Türkiye using a structured, modified Delphi methodology. Draft statements informed by systematic literature reviews were rated via online surveys using a 9-point Likert scale, followed by two Delphi rounds and a face-to-face consensus meeting in İstanbul in October 2025.
resultsRecommendations addressed sun exposure, laboratory assessment, screening, supplementation, treatment, and follow-up. Serum 25(OH)D <20 ng/mL was defined as deficiency and <12 ng/mL as severe deficiency, with a target range of 20-50 ng/mL. Routine population-wide screening was not recommended; instead, targeted testing in high-risk adults and symptom-driven biochemical evaluation were endorsed. Empiric supplementation was recommended for selected high-risk groups, with cholecalciferol as the preferred agent. Higher individualized doses were suggested in obesity or malabsorption, while loading regimens were reserved for specific clinical indications, such as severe deficiency or certain medical conditions that impair vitamin D metabolism. Reassessment of 25(OH)D at 8-12 weeks was recommended.
conclusionThese consensus-based recommendations provide a practical, context-specific framework for assessing, preventing, treating, and monitoring vitamin D deficiency in adults in Türkiye.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.