ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Assessment of Dermally Bioaccessible Elements by Sweat-Simulated Extraction: Analytical Approach and Application to Tattoo Inks.
Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Beyond Total Content: Assessing the Bioaccessibility of Metals in Tattoo Inks Using Validated Extraction Media.Analytical science advances · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The determination of soluble elemental contaminants in tattoo inks is challenged by the lack of standardized extraction procedures, limiting the comparability of analytical results and the assessment of exposure-relevant fractions under the European REACH framework. In this study, artificial sweat extraction was applied as a mild and physiologically relevant approach to evaluate elements potentially released from tattoo inks under sweat-simulated skin-contact conditions. Seventy-eight commercial tattoo inks of different colors were extracted with artificial sweat at 37 °C for 1 h and analyzed by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Optimization of collision/reaction cell conditions, dilution strategy, and internal standard correction effectively reduced matrix-related interferences caused by the high salt and chloride content of artificial sweat, ensuring reliable quantification. Matrix-matched calibration was required due to significant signal suppression for several analytes. Method accuracy and precision, assessed using NIST 1643f and spiked samples, were generally satisfactory. Elemental release showed marked color-dependent trends, particularly for Cu, Zn, Ba, Al, Ga, Si, Sr, and Zr, reflecting differences in pigment composition and formulation. Soluble Ba, Cu, and Zn remained below EU regulatory limits. While total digestion remains essential for complete characterization, the proposed methodology provides a simple and transferable tool for exposure-oriented assessment of potentially bioaccessible elements in tattoo inks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.