Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42280067›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Recent Development of Back-Contacted Single-Crystal Perovskite Solar Cells.

Xiao Cheng

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Xiao ChengSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1881-805X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The efficiency of perovskite solar cells has increased to a certified value of 27% over the past decade, benefiting from the superior properties of metal halide perovskite materials. However, their long-term operational stability is still far inferior to that of commercial crystalline silicon solar cells. A key source of this instability is field-driven ion migration in vertical architectures, along with the consequent degradation at the absorber-electrode interfaces. Compared with the widely investigated vertical structures, back-contacted (BC) perovskite solar cells-wherein both electrodes are positioned on the same side of the absorber-offer a unique route to suppress interfacial ion migration and thereby enhance long-term device stability. These advantages are especially pronounced when combined with single-crystal perovskites, which possess low charge trap densities, long carrier diffusion lengths, and high bulk ion migration barriers. Unfortunately, only a handful of research groups have participated in the development of single-crystal BC perovskite solar cells; thus, the advancement of this area lags far behind that of its vertical counterpart. Therefore, a review that discusses the recent developments and challenges of single-crystal BC perovskite solar cells is urgently required to provide guidelines for this emerging field. In this progress report, we first introduce the main growth methods of single-crystal wafers compatible with BC architectures, followed by an outline of the developmental history of BC perovskite solar cells. Finally, the core bottlenecks facing single-crystal BC devices and corresponding optimization strategies are discussed in detail.

Indexed as

back-contacted perovskite solar cellssingle-crystal perovskitesingle-crystal thin filmsstability

Identifiers

PMID42280067
PMCPMC13257726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.