ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Optimization of Sensor Network for Velocity-Free Acoustic Emission Source Localization in Construction Materials.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Acoustic emission (AE) source localization provides important spatial information for damage characterization and fracture evolution analysis in construction materials, while its accuracy and applicability are strongly dependent on sensor network design. This study proposes an optimization framework for selecting an effective six-sensor network for velocity-free AE source localization in construction materials. The source coordinates are determined by solving a nonlinear inverse problem using the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm, and candidate sensor subsets are evaluated by combining location error metrics with the number of effective localization results to quantify the effective monitoring range for damage characterization. The framework is investigated through numerical simulations and pencil-lead break tests on a 600 mm × 600 mm ceramic tile. Among different six-sensor configurations, the best-performing layouts place four sensors at the outer corners and two sensors at the horizontal or vertical inner corners. A benchmark comparison with the Fisher-information-based optimized sensor network and sensitivity analyses further show that the optimized sensor network maintains higher effective monitoring ranges under arrival-time noise, velocity uncertainty, and sensor coordinate perturbations. The proposed approach provides a useful reference for robust and cost-effective AE sensor network design in damage monitoring, fracture characterization, and nondestructive evaluation of construction materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.