ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A Review of Modelling Test Study on the Effect of Single-Line Tunnelling on Adjacent Piles: Test Materials, Methodologies and Results.
Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Model Test on the Multi-Effects of Tunneling and Excavation upon an Existing Pile in Clay.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tunnelling-induced safety risks from adjacent piles have become increasingly severe with the rapid development of urban underground space. Model tests have become essential for revealing the complex pile-tunnel interaction mechanism. This paper reviews the research progress of model tests on the influence of single-line tunnelling on adjacent piles, focusing on test soil materials, tunnel simulation methodologies, analysis of test results, and research prospects. However, current model test studies are constrained by several critical limitations, including insufficient similarity between soil materials and prototype conditions, and overly idealized simulation of tunnel excavation. This paper identifies a significant research gap: the inability of current volume-loss techniques to capture 3D dynamic factors (e.g., face pressure and grouting timing) and the lack of meso-scale observation at the pile-soil interface. This review provides a systematic synthesis of these methodological challenges and proposes future research prospects to provide a more scientific basis for engineering design and risk control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.