ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Controllable Surface Structures of Hydroxyapatite Processed by Picosecond Laser in Air and Underwater: A Comparative Study of Experiment and Simulation.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hydroxyapatite (HA) serves as an ideal in vitro substitute model for calcified plaques. At present, the influence mechanisms of processing parameters and operating environments on the machining morphology and thermal evolution of HA during picosecond laser processing remain unclear, and there is a lack of systematic analyses combining experiments and simulations. In this study, the effects of laser parameters and operating environments on structural parameters were systematically investigated from both experimental and simulation perspectives. The results demonstrate that within the laser energy range of 30-70 μJ, the groove depth and width are 12.1-47.8 μm and 15.6-32.1 μm in air, respectively, while they reach 15.4-48.6 μm and 22.4-47.3 μm underwater. Within the repetition frequency range of 100-140 kHz, the groove depth and width are 27.3-36.1 μm and 21.3-27.7 μm in air, respectively, compared with 34.6-45.4 μm and 33.3-53.3 μm underwater. The underwater-processed grooves exhibit larger dimensions and higher temperature-field values than those processed in air. Morphological observations further show that the groove bottoms formed in air exhibit bamboo-joint-like and granular features, whereas the underwater-processed grooves present a more uniformly distributed granular morphology. The simulation results agree well with the experimental data, with errors controlled within 12%, verifying the reliability of the established model. This study elucidates the morphological and thermal mechanisms of HA picosecond laser processing, supporting biomedical HA machining and paving the way for calcified plaque ablation and bone repair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.