ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Multiscale Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Frames with Embedded Metamaterials Under Progressive Collapse.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Progressive collapse represents a catastrophic failure mode for reinforced concrete (RC) structures, yet the use of architected materials to mitigate this risk remains largely unexplored. This study presents a numerical feasibility investigation of RC beam-column sub-assemblages with auxetic metamaterial inserts embedded in critical joint regions. A hierarchical multiscale framework is developed to link the effective behavior of auxetic metamaterials with structure-scale collapse response. The framework couples macroscale structural analysis with mesoscale fracture simulations through a hybrid voxel-Voronoi discretization strategy. Baseline finite element models are validated against published experimental results for conventional RC specimens, while the auxetic-enhanced configurations are evaluated numerically. Under high tensile strain, the auxetic insert expands laterally because of its negative Poisson's ratio and generates a localized confining stress field within the surrounding concrete. The simulations suggest that this mechanism may promote crack bifurcation, redistribute localized cracking into a more distributed damage pattern, and delay compressive crushing and crack coalescence. Compared with the corresponding conventional RC configurations, the auxetic-enhanced models predict a 25% increase in load redistribution capacity and a 20% enhancement in deformation ductility. These predicted improvements require future experimental validation using physical auxetic-enhanced RC specimens. The findings provide a computational basis for exploring material-by-design strategies aimed at improving the robustness of critical RC joint regions under progressive collapse demands.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.