ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Mechanical Properties and Microscopic Mechanism of Shield Tunnel Spoil Stabilized with ESCA.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The efficient treatment and resource utilization of shield tunnel spoil (STS) are important for sustainable underground construction in China. To improve the early mechanical performance and microstructural compactness of stabilized STS, this study investigated the solidification effect of a novel early-strength cementitious agent (ESCA) and compared it with ordinary Portland cement (P.O 42.5). Macroscopic mechanical tests, including unconfined compressive strength (UCS), stress-strain behavior, mass, and P-wave velocity measurements, were combined with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and computed tomography (CT) analyses to reveal the mechanical response and microstructural mechanisms of stabilized STS. The results indicate that, compared with P.O 42.5, ESCA exhibits superior fluidity at lower water-to-solid (w/s) ratios, significantly shorter setting times, and higher compressive strength at all curing ages. The solidification efficiency of ESCA for STS is notably superior to that of P.O 42.5, with the peak strength, elastic modulus, mass, and P-wave velocity of ESCA-solidified specimens being higher than those of P.O 42.5-solidified specimens across the five dosages. Furthermore, ESCA material bonds more tightly with STS particles, resulting in lower porosity and a denser microstructure under the same stabilizer dosage. Overall, the combination of macroscopic mechanical properties and microstructural characterization demonstrates that ESCA material exhibits significant advantages in the efficient solidification and resource utilization of shield tunnel spoil.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.