ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
ASW-YOLO: Lightweight Gear Defect Detection with Improved YOLOv8n.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Aiming at the problems of diverse defect types, large-scale differences, and complex background interference in gear surface defect detection, a lightweight model, ASW-YOLO, is proposed based on YOLOv8n. By using an ADown dual downsampling module to compress feature map resolution and preserve fine-grained information. C2f_SE channel attention is introduced to enhance small-scale defect response. The CIoU is replaced with WIoU to optimize multi-scale target localization accuracy. The experiments are conducted on the gear dataset. The comparative experiments show that mAP@0.5 of ASW-YOLO reached 94.8%, an increase of 4.5% compared to YOLOv8n, with a reduction of 9.3% in parameter count and 8.5% in computational complexity. The ablation experiments confirm the effectiveness of the three modules. ASW-YOLO achieves a 4.5% increase in mAP@0.5 and a 6.1% increase in recall compared to YOLOv8n. The generalization experiments demonstrate that the mAP@0.5 fluctuation of ASW-YOLO remains below 2% under strong highlight and striped shadow. Moreover, the model maintains over 85% mAP@0.5 under motion blur. ASW-YOLO balances precision and lightweight, making it suitable for real-time quality monitoring in industry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.