ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Experimental Study on Mechanical and Microstructural Properties of Foam Concrete Incorporating Desert Sand as Partial Fine Aggregate.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The escalating depletion of river sand resources poses a critical sustainability challenge for the production of foam concrete, while the reinforcement mechanism of locally abundant aeolian sand in cementitious matrices remains insufficiently quantified. To address this gap, the present study investigates the feasibility of partially substituting river sand with Taklamakan desert sand at replacement ratios of 0%, 20%, and 40%, under varying water-to-binder (W/B) ratios (0.3, 0.4, 0.5) and sand-to-binder (S/B) ratios (0, 0.3, 0.6). To correlate macroscopic performance with microstructural features, compressive strength was tested, and pore structure evolution was characterized using deep learning-based image segmentation, supplemented by XRD and SEM analyses. Results indicate that increasing the W/B ratio from 0.3 to 0.5 elevates porosity by up to 111.7%, resulting in a 47.4% reduction in compressive strength. Similarly, raising the S/B ratio from 0 to 0.6 introduces additional interfacial transition zones (ITZs) and dilutes the cementitious phase, which consequently weakens the matrix and leads to a strength reduction of up to 66.5%. However, the contribution of desert sand replacement exhibits a pronounced "S/B ratio dependence". Notably, at an S/B ratio of 0.6 and a 40% desert sand replacement rate, the compressive strength experiences a significant increase of 51.4% compared to the control group. Quantitative analysis further reveals that the compressive strength follows positive and negative power-law relationships with dry density and porosity, respectively. Ecological assessment shows that desert sand foam concrete (DSFC) with high S/B and high desert sand replacement ratio reduces embodied CO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.