ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Comparison of the Mechanical Properties and Surface Characteristics of Vat Photopolymerization Resin Materials and a Polymethyl Methacrylate Disc Material.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Additive manufacturing using vat photopolymerization (VPP) resin materials has gained attention for fabricating dental prostheses; however, the effects of material type and build angle on their properties remain unclear. We compared the mechanical properties of two filler-containing VPP hybrid resins, SprintRay Ceramic Crown (CC) and OnX Tough 2 (OT), with those of a conventional polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) disc material, and evaluated the influence of build angle on surface characteristics, dimensional accuracy, and mechanical performance. Specimens were fabricated using a DLP system at build angles of 0°, 45°, and 90°. Vickers hardness, surface morphology and roughness, dimensional deviations, flexural strength, elastic modulus, and fracture energy were assessed according to relevant standards. CC exhibited significantly higher hardness and elastic modulus than PMMA and OT, whereas OT showed the highest fracture energy. Surface morphology and roughness were strongly affected by build angle, with 45° producing distinct periodic patterns and increased roughness. Dimensional evaluation revealed a tendency toward overbuilding, particularly in the vertical direction at 45°. Flexural properties were also influenced by build angle, with 45° generally providing favorable performance. Both material composition and build angle affect VPP-fabricated dental resin performance, highlighting the importance of appropriate material and processing selection for clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.