ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Axial Load Capacity Prediction of Concrete-Filled Steel Tubes Using Machine Learning: A Comparative Study.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Concrete-filled steel tubes (CFSTs) combine the advantages of both steel and concrete and have been widely applied in recent years due to their excellent mechanical performance and economic efficiency. This paper focuses on the axial load capacity of CFST columns. First, 227 sets of experimental data were collected to develop axial load capacity prediction models using six machine learning algorithms. Second, the existing design code-recommended calculation models were evaluated. Subsequently, parameter importance and sensitivity analyses were conducted using the optimal machine learning model, and a graphical user interface was developed for predicting the axial load capacity of circular CFST columns. The results show that the eXtreme Gradient Boosting model is the most suitable for predicting the axial load capacity of CFST columns. In contrast, the stability and accuracy of the code-recommended models need improvement. The steel tube diameter and thickness have a significantly greater influence on axial load capacity compared to other parameters. Within specific ranges, increasing all parameters except column length enhances the axial load capacity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.