ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Image-Based Classification of Concrete Carbonation Using YOLO Models.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Detecting the presence of carbonation is critical for monitoring structural safety and durability. Identifying the presence of carbonation reveals the risk of chemical changes within the concrete and the potential for reinforcement corrosion. This detection allows for a reliable and prioritized assessment of the structure's current condition. Therefore, checking for the presence or absence of carbonation is a critical indicator in determining structural safety and maintenance priorities. This study explicitly addresses a critical gap in the literature, where existing carbonation research predominantly focuses on regression-based estimation of carbonation depth, while the problem of direct visual classification of carbonation presence for rapid decision-making currently remains underexplored. In this context, the study aims to fill this research gap through developing a robust and field-applicable deep learning-based classification framework for the automated detection of carbonation presence on concrete surfaces using images, while systematically comparing the performance of different YOLO architectures and assessing the suitability of a previously unused dataset (ConcreteCARB) for carbonation classification tasks. In this context, YOLOv8m, YOLOv11m, YOLOv12m, and YOLOv26m were compared for concrete carbonation classification, aiming to find the most suitable model. The results show that YOLOv8m and YOLOv11m achieve perfect accuracy (Accuracy = 0.9981, Precision = 1, Recall = 0.9964, Specificity = 1, AUC-ROC = 1). In inference efficiency analyses, the YOLOv11m model was identified as the fastest model with the lowest latency and highest FPS. While YOLOv8m and YOLOv26m offered balanced speed-performance results, YOLOv12m showed a relatively lower processing speed. The findings indicate that YOLOv11m is the most suitable option for real-time applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.