ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Investigation on the Screening and Taste Mechanisms of Umami Peptides in Natural and Hydrolyzed Jinhua Ham.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to identify novel umami peptides from both natural and enzymatically hydrolyzed peptides from Jinhua ham, and to characterize their properties. Following LC-MS identification, known flavor sequences were annotated using a curated flavor-peptide database containing 2617 known flavor peptides, and potential novel umami peptides were screened through an integrated approach combining multiple machine learning models and LibDock molecular docking. From over 2000 identified peptides, this integrated virtual screening pipeline precisely yielded 10 candidate umami peptides, which were confirmed to possess distinct umami characteristics by sensory evaluation and electronic tongue analysis. These peptides had umami intensities ranging from 2.87 ± 1.38 to 3.90 ± 1.56 and significantly lower taste thresholds (0.1109-0.2634 mg/mL) than that of monosodium glutamate (MSG, 0.3 mg/mL). Subsequent CDOCKER analysis demonstrated significantly stronger binding affinity and stability of these peptides to the T1R1/T1R3 receptor compared with MSG, with -CDOCKER ENERGY values of 78.45-94.95 and -CDOCKER INTERACTION ENERGY values of 56.67-86.71, both significantly higher than those of MSG (22.27 and 46.58, respectively). Hydrogen bonds were identified as the dominant binding force, accounting for over 66% of total interactions, and HIS145 and ARG247 were confirmed as the key residues maintaining the stability of the peptide-receptor complex. Overall, these findings provide mechanistic insight into the umami properties of Jinhua ham peptides and support their potential application in food processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.