Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42279704›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Revealing the Differences in Taste/Mouthfeel Quality of Raw Pu-erh Tea Under Different Drying Methods Based on Nontargeted and Targeted Metabolomics.

Zhengfei Luo, Linlong Ma, Faxing Wan, Xueyan Liu, Yangtao Zhang, Ting Xu, Qiqian Su, Dan Cao, Yanli Liu, Xiaomei Yan and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Zhengfei LuoYunnan Key Laboratory of Tea Germplasm Conservation and Utilization in the Lancang River Basin, College of Biotechnology and Engineering, West Yunnan University, Lincang 677000, China.
Linlong MaKey Laboratory of Tea Resources Comprehensive Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Fruit and Tea Research Institute, Hubei Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan 430064, China.
Faxing WanKey Laboratory of Tea Resources Comprehensive Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Fruit and Tea Research Institute, Hubei Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan 430064, China.ORCID 0009-0003-6094-4708
Xueyan LiuYunnan Key Laboratory of Tea Germplasm Conservation and Utilization in the Lancang River Basin, College of Biotechnology and Engineering, West Yunnan University, Lincang 677000, China.
Yangtao ZhangLincang Inspection Testing and Certification Institute, Lincang 677000, China.
Ting XuYunnan Key Laboratory of Tea Germplasm Conservation and Utilization in the Lancang River Basin, College of Biotechnology and Engineering, West Yunnan University, Lincang 677000, China.
Qiqian SuYunnan Key Laboratory of Tea Germplasm Conservation and Utilization in the Lancang River Basin, College of Biotechnology and Engineering, West Yunnan University, Lincang 677000, China.
Dan CaoKey Laboratory of Tea Resources Comprehensive Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Fruit and Tea Research Institute, Hubei Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan 430064, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4219-5593
Yanli LiuKey Laboratory of Tea Resources Comprehensive Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Fruit and Tea Research Institute, Hubei Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan 430064, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7397-5966
Xiaomei YanKey Laboratory of Tea Resources Comprehensive Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Fruit and Tea Research Institute, Hubei Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan 430064, China.
Yanhong LiuYunnan Key Laboratory of Tea Germplasm Conservation and Utilization in the Lancang River Basin, College of Biotechnology and Engineering, West Yunnan University, Lincang 677000, China.
Xiaofang JinKey Laboratory of Tea Resources Comprehensive Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Fruit and Tea Research Institute, Hubei Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan 430064, China.

Funding

The Open Fund of Yunnan Key Laboratory of Tea Germplasms Conservation and Utilization in the Lancang River Basin YNTGCU202506The Scientific Research Fund Project of Yunnan Provincial Department of Education 2024J1110The Yunnan Key Laboratory of Tea Germplasms Conservation and Utilization in the Lancang River Basin 202449CE340010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drying plays a critical role in shaping tea quality. This study systematically investigated the differences in the taste/mouthfeel quality of hot-air drying raw Pu-erh tea (HDRPT), pan-fired drying raw Pu-erh tea (PDRPT), and sun drying raw Pu-erh tea (SDRPT). The results showed that SDRPT exhibited a mellow and thick mouthfeel with a sweet aftertaste, and significantly higher intensities of umami and sweetness compared to PDRPT and HDRPT. The relatively higher contents of amino acids such as theanine, glutamic acid, aspartic acid, and glutamine, along with water-soluble sugars, and relatively lower contents of catechins, including ECG and EGCG, were identified as key material bases contributing to the unique taste/mouthfeel quality of SDRPT. A total of 1987 non-volatile components were detected, from which 137 differential non-volatile components were screened. Among these, 75 components in SDRPT showed significant differences from both PDRPT and HDRPT, with the majority exhibiting higher relative contents in SDRRT, particularly notable among lipids, phenolic acids, and terpenoids. Furthermore, all 75 differential components were significantly correlated with at least one taste/mouthfeel attribute, with most showing significant positive correlations with umami, sweetness, and sourness, and significant negative correlations with bitterness and astringency. These findings provide a theoretical foundation for understanding the mechanism by which drying techniques influence the taste/mouthfeel quality formation of raw Pu-erh tea, and offer a scientific basis for improving its quality.

Indexed as

drying methodsmetabolomicsraw Pu-erh teataste/mouthfeel quality

Identifiers

PMID42279704
PMCPMC13256823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.