ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Revealing the Differences in Taste/Mouthfeel Quality of Raw Pu-erh Tea Under Different Drying Methods Based on Nontargeted and Targeted Metabolomics.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Drying plays a critical role in shaping tea quality. This study systematically investigated the differences in the taste/mouthfeel quality of hot-air drying raw Pu-erh tea (HDRPT), pan-fired drying raw Pu-erh tea (PDRPT), and sun drying raw Pu-erh tea (SDRPT). The results showed that SDRPT exhibited a mellow and thick mouthfeel with a sweet aftertaste, and significantly higher intensities of umami and sweetness compared to PDRPT and HDRPT. The relatively higher contents of amino acids such as theanine, glutamic acid, aspartic acid, and glutamine, along with water-soluble sugars, and relatively lower contents of catechins, including ECG and EGCG, were identified as key material bases contributing to the unique taste/mouthfeel quality of SDRPT. A total of 1987 non-volatile components were detected, from which 137 differential non-volatile components were screened. Among these, 75 components in SDRPT showed significant differences from both PDRPT and HDRPT, with the majority exhibiting higher relative contents in SDRRT, particularly notable among lipids, phenolic acids, and terpenoids. Furthermore, all 75 differential components were significantly correlated with at least one taste/mouthfeel attribute, with most showing significant positive correlations with umami, sweetness, and sourness, and significant negative correlations with bitterness and astringency. These findings provide a theoretical foundation for understanding the mechanism by which drying techniques influence the taste/mouthfeel quality formation of raw Pu-erh tea, and offer a scientific basis for improving its quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.