Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42279695›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Bioresource Potential and Safety Evaluations of Thai

Mathukorn Sainakham, Wantida Chaiyana, Kanokwan Kiattisin, Suvimol Somwongin, Worrapan Poomanee, Vanuchawan Wisuitiprot

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mathukorn SainakhamDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.
Wantida ChaiyanaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-2868-7049
Kanokwan KiattisinDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-4280-1079
Suvimol SomwonginDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-1801-6476
Worrapan PoomaneeDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-6324-4377
Vanuchawan WisuitiprotDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-2213-8951

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Corn husk, a prevalent agricultural byproduct, remains an underutilized source of bioactive compounds. This study investigated the influence of extraction solvents (water, 50% ethanol, and 95% ethanol) and techniques (maceration, reflux, ultrasound-assisted extraction) on the phytochemical profiles and biological activities of corn husk. The results revealed that water extraction produced the highest total phenolic content, whereas 95% ethanol extraction yielded the greatest total flavonoid content and the most potent antioxidant activity in DPPH testing. In contrast, ultrasound-assisted water extraction exhibited the most potent nitric oxide inhibition (94.62 ± 2.13%) and tyrosinase inhibition (IC

Indexed as

bioactivitycorn husk extractsgreen extractionHET-CAMvalue-added upcycling

Identifiers

PMID42279695
PMCPMC13256110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.