Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42279651›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Temporal Screening of High-Risk Food Service Inspections in New York State, 2023-2025: A Case Study Using Multimodal Evidential Learning.

Zi-Heng Cai, Wang-Chin Tsai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zi-Heng CaiGraduate School of Design, National Yunlin University of Science & Technology, Yunlin 64002, Taiwan.ORCID 0009-0001-5153-4200
Wang-Chin TsaiDepartment of Creative Design, National Yunlin University of Science & Technology, Yunlin 64002, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-4071-1563

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Food safety inspection systems generate rich historical records, yet converting these records into actionable pre-inspection risk signals remains challenging under limited regulatory resources. The objective of this study was to develop and evaluate a temporally valid, leakage-free, multimodal screening framework for identifying high-risk food service inspections before the upcoming inspection outcome is known. Existing studies have improved inspection prediction with machine learning, but many focus on contemporaneous classification rather than temporally valid high-risk screening, and few jointly model historical numeric behavior, prior narrative context, and predictive uncertainty. To address this gap, this study proposes a temporal high-risk food inspection screening framework based on multimodal evidential learning. Using New York State food service inspection data, we constructed a event-level dataset of 55,454 inspections from 20,082 establishments and predicted whether an upcoming inspection would be high-risk using only pre-inspection information. The proposed evidential deep learning multilayer perceptron integrates current metadata, longitudinal numeric history, and historical inspection comments while producing calibrated uncertainty estimates for selective prediction. On the held-out test set, the proposed model achieved the best overall performance, with an AUROC of 0.846, AUPRC of 0.424, F1 score of 0.431, Brier score of 0.063, and ECE of 0.012, outperforming strong tabular baselines including CatBoost and TabM. Under selective prediction, its retained-set F1 increased from 0.431 at full coverage to 0.542 at 80% coverage. Explainability analysis further showed that predictive gains were driven primarily by historical compliance dynamics, with historical text providing complementary contextual value. These findings support the use of temporally valid, uncertainty-aware multimodal models for risk-based food inspection prioritization.

Indexed as

evidential deep learningfood safety inspectionhigh-risk screeningmultimodal learningrisk-based regulationuncertainty quantification

Identifiers

PMID42279651
PMCPMC13256328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.