Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42279374›Full record

ReviewCancers2026

N1 Staging in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Current Situation, Limitations, and the Importance of Peripheral Nodal Assessment.

Tsukasa Ishiwata

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Tsukasa IshiwataDivision of Respirology, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate regional lymph node staging is essential for guiding treatment and predicting outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer. While the 9th edition of the TNM classification introduced prognostic subdivisions for N2 disease, the N1 category remains a single, unified descriptor. However, N1 disease is highly heterogeneous. Evidence shows significant survival differences between single-station (N1a) and multi-station (N1b) involvement, as well as between peripheral (N1p) and hilar (N1h) metastases. Standard medical imaging evaluation and conventional bronchoscopy often fail to detect "occult N1 disease," leading to postoperative stage migration and suboptimal treatment sequencing. This diagnostic gap affects critical clinical decisions, including the selection of patients for sublobar resection, the administration of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy, and the precision of radiation target volumes. The main obstacle to refining N1 staging has been the limited ability of existing clinical staging modalities to access and accurately assess N1p nodes. However, recent technological advances, particularly in thin convex probe endobronchial ultrasound examination, have renewed interest in bronchoscopic evaluation of N1p and in improving preoperative clinical N1 staging. The purpose of this review is to summarize the biological and immunological basis for N1 subclassification and evaluate how emerging technologies can bridge the gap between clinical and pathological staging. Refining the N1 compartment is vital for a personalized staging system that reflects the true biological spectrum of lung cancer.

Indexed as

N1 stagingnon-small cell lung canceroccult N1 diseaseperipheral lymph nodessublobar resectionthin convex probe endobronchial ultrasoundTNM classification

Identifiers

PMID42279374
PMCPMC13255767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.