Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42279293›Full record

ReviewCancers2026

Immunotherapy in Endometrial Cancer: Molecular Classification, Clinical Evidence, and Therapeutic Implications: A Narrative Review.

Pablo Padilla-Iserte, Silvia Cabrera, Sonia Gatius Calderó, Ana de Juan Ferré, Katarina Majercakova, María Jesús Rubio-Pérez, Ignacio Romero, Maria Pilar Barretina-Ginesta, Manel Barahona Orpinell

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Pablo Padilla-IserteDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe (IISLAFE), 46026 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0524-6213
Silvia CabreraDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Institut de Recerca Sant Pau (IR SANT PAU), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08041 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3164-6686
Sonia Gatius CalderóDepartment of Pathology, Arnau de Vilanova University Hospital, Institut de Recerca Biomèdica de Lleida, University of Lleida, 25198 Lleida, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1636-6010
Ana de Juan FerréDepartment of Medical Oncology, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Instituto de Investigación Marqués de Valdecilla (IDIVAL), 39008 Cantabria, Spain.
Katarina MajercakovaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, 08041 Barcelona, Spain.
María Jesús Rubio-PérezDepartment of Medical Oncology, Reina Sofía University Hospitalv Córdoba, 14004 Córdoba, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3682-3597
Ignacio RomeroDepartment of Medical Oncology, Valencian Institute of Oncology (IVO) Foundation, 46009 Valencia, Spain.
Maria Pilar Barretina-GinestaMedical Oncology Department, Institut Català d'Oncologia, Girona Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBGI-CERCA), Girona University, 17007 Girona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0074-6614
Manel Barahona OrpinellDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, University Hospital Limerick, Mid-West HSEl, V94 F858 Limerick, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesEndometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecologic malignancy in developed countries, with increasing incidence and limited options in advanced disease. Molecular classification has redefined risk stratification and therapeutic decision-making, particularly with the incorporation of immunotherapy. This review provides a clinically oriented overview of immunotherapy in EC across molecular subgroups and treatment settings.

methodsA narrative review was conducted using PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science, focusing on clinical trials and studies with direct clinical relevance.

resultsImmune checkpoint inhibitors targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 axis have demonstrated significant benefit in EC, particularly in mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR)/microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) tumors, where durable responses are observed. In contrast, mismatch repair-proficient (pMMR) tumors show limited sensitivity to monotherapy and require combination approaches. Recent phase III trials have established chemoimmunotherapy as a first-line standard, with greater benefit in dMMR tumors and clinically meaningful improvements in pMMR disease. In the second-line setting, PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy is standard for dMMR tumors, while lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab is a key option for pMMR disease. However, responses remain heterogeneous and are not fully explained by MMR status alone.

conclusionsImmunotherapy is a cornerstone in advanced EC management, guided by molecular classification. Key challenges include limited efficacy in pMMR tumors, lack of robust predictive biomarkers, and uncertainty in treatment sequencing. Future strategies should focus on biomarker-driven approaches and rational combinations.

Indexed as

endometrial cancerimmune checkpoint inhibitorsimmunotherapymismatch repair deficiencymolecular classificationPD-1/PD-L1

Identifiers

PMID42279293
PMCPMC13255895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.