Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42279255›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2026

Congenital Pericardial Agenesis: An Innocent Finding or Clinically Significant Condition? A Case Series and Literature Review.

Violeta Groudeva, Maria Rovithaki, Anna Joseph, Stefan Naydenov

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Violeta GroudevaUMHAT "St. Ekaterina" EAD, Medical University of Sofia, 1431 Sofia, Bulgaria.
Maria RovithakiMedical Faculty, Medical University of Sofia, 1431 Sofia, Bulgaria.
Anna JosephMedical Faculty, Medical University of Sofia, 1431 Sofia, Bulgaria.
Stefan NaydenovDepartment of Internal Diseases "Prof. St. Kirkovich", Medical University of Sofia, 1431 Sofia, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0002-0855-7861

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Congenital pericardial agenesis (CPA) is a rare anomaly that is often considered a benign incidental finding but may present with nonspecific symptoms and mimic structural heart disease. Its clinical relevance remains incompletely defined, particularly regarding the distinction between a harmless anatomical variant and a clinically significant condition. We present a retrospective two-center case series of four patients with imaging-confirmed CPA, combined with a narrative review of the literature aiming to evaluate the clinical spectrum, diagnostic challenges, and management implications of CPA. The clinical presentation of our patients was heterogeneous, ranging from incidental findings to chest discomfort and dyspnea. In all cases, initial echocardiography suggested alternative diagnoses, including right ventricular cardiomyopathy, atrial septal defect, or pericardial disease, leading to diagnostic uncertainty. Definitive diagnosis was established using multimodality imaging, particularly cardiac magnetic resonance and computed tomography, which demonstrated characteristic features such as cardiac levoposition and interposition of lung parenchyma. Three patients had complete left pericardial agenesis and one had a partial defect. All patients were managed conservatively, without complications during follow-up.

Indexed as

clinical relevancecongenital pericardial agenesisfollow-uptreatment

Identifiers

PMID42279255
PMCPMC13258782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.