ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2026
Congenital Pericardial Agenesis: An Innocent Finding or Clinically Significant Condition? A Case Series and Literature Review.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Congenital pericardial agenesis (CPA) is a rare anomaly that is often considered a benign incidental finding but may present with nonspecific symptoms and mimic structural heart disease. Its clinical relevance remains incompletely defined, particularly regarding the distinction between a harmless anatomical variant and a clinically significant condition. We present a retrospective two-center case series of four patients with imaging-confirmed CPA, combined with a narrative review of the literature aiming to evaluate the clinical spectrum, diagnostic challenges, and management implications of CPA. The clinical presentation of our patients was heterogeneous, ranging from incidental findings to chest discomfort and dyspnea. In all cases, initial echocardiography suggested alternative diagnoses, including right ventricular cardiomyopathy, atrial septal defect, or pericardial disease, leading to diagnostic uncertainty. Definitive diagnosis was established using multimodality imaging, particularly cardiac magnetic resonance and computed tomography, which demonstrated characteristic features such as cardiac levoposition and interposition of lung parenchyma. Three patients had complete left pericardial agenesis and one had a partial defect. All patients were managed conservatively, without complications during follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.