Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42279135›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026

Open, Hybrid and Endovascular Management of Aortic Arch Aneurysms: Recent Updates and Future Directions.

Dhruv R Patel, Mohamed N Elshabrawi, Mohammed Rahouma, Akshay Kumar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dhruv R PatelNYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA.
Mohamed N ElshabrawiFaculty of Medicine, Port Said University, Port Said 42526, Egypt.ORCID 0009-0004-2490-7210
Mohammed RahoumaDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10065, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8678-2060
Akshay KumarDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY 10016, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2718-0606

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Once considered a surgical frontier fraught with risk, aortic arch aneurysms now represent a domain of evolving innovation. Despite their rarity, they pose severe risks of dissection, rupture, and mortality if not adequately managed. Primarily caused by prior aortic dissections, atherosclerosis, or connective tissue disorders, these aneurysms are often found incidentally on CTA or MRA imaging. Medical management focuses on reducing aortic wall stress through blood pressure control, risk factor modification, and regular imaging to monitor growth. Surgical intervention is typically indicated when the aneurysm diameter exceeds 5.5 cm, exhibits rapid growth, or causes symptoms such as compression or dissection. Open repair remains the gold standard for treatment due to its superior long-term outcomes, though hybrid and endovascular approaches are favored for high-risk patients due to reduced perioperative morbidity. Innovations in hybrid techniques and endovascular devices, alongside advancements in cerebral perfusion strategies, are shaping the future of personalized and minimally invasive approaches to aortic arch repair. This comprehensive review delves into the current management strategies for these aneurysms.

Indexed as

aortic arch aneurysmendovascular treatmenthybrid technique

Identifiers

PMID42279135
PMCPMC13257840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.