ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
Mechanistic Non-Response After Psychotherapy for Anxiety Disorders: A Maintenance-Mechanism-Based Clinical Taxonomy.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anxiety disorders are disabling and treated with cognitive-behavioral or exposure-based psychotherapy. However, many patients remain symptomatic, fail to remit, relapse, or discontinue treatment. This narrative review examined whether psychotherapy non-response, defined here as persistent clinically significant anxiety symptoms, avoidance, or functional impairment after an apparently adequate psychotherapy trial, may reflect mismatch between therapeutic mechanisms and the dominant processes maintaining anxiety, and aimed to develop a usable taxonomy of mechanistic non-response. This structured narrative review followed SANRA principles. PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched for peer-reviewed literature published from 1 January 2000 to 30 April 2026, including selected earlier landmark studies. Clinical, experimental, neurobiological, psychophysiological, process, and theoretical evidence were synthesized narratively. Psychotherapy mechanisms were organized around inhibitory learning, cognitive reappraisal, attentional modulation, emotion regulation, avoidance reversal, and interpersonal learning. Anxiety maintenance was multilevel, involving threat neurocircuitry, stress-related learning conditions, intolerance of uncertainty, attentional threat capture, safety behaviors, avoidance reinforcement, developmental adversity, and attachment insecurity. Non-response was framed as mismatch between the dominant maintaining process and the therapeutic mechanism expected to modify it. Six failure modes were identified: impaired inhibitory learning, cognitive rigidity/intolerance of uncertainty, stress-related learning impairment, attentional dysregulation, attachment-related barriers, and chronic avoidance dominance. Psychotherapy non-response in adult anxiety disorders should prompt mechanistic reformulation rather than repetition of the same intervention or labeling as treatment resistance. The taxonomy links recognizable failure signatures to mechanism-matched adaptations: redesigned exposure, uncertainty-focused work, attentional interventions, sequencing when arousal or sleep impairs learning, relational repair, and reduction in avoidance contingencies. The narrative review provides a concise clinical taxonomy and practical mechanism-matched adaptations to guide reformulation and treatment redesign after psychotherapy non-response in routine care. The taxonomy supports mechanism-matched reformulation after psychotherapy non-response and requires prospective validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.