ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2026
Remimazolam-Induced Anaphylaxis After Spinal Anesthesia: A Case Report and Literature Review.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Perioperative anaphylaxis, though rare, is a potentially life-threatening complication. While antibiotics and neuromuscular blocking agents are common triggers, benzodiazepine-induced reactions have been considered uncommon. Remimazolam, a novel benzodiazepine sedative, has gained widespread use in Korea due to its rapid onset, short recovery, hemodynamic stability, and availability of flumazenil. However, increasing utilization has coincided with rising reports of hypersensitivity. We report the case of a 62-year-old female undergoing contralateral total knee replacement under spinal anesthesia. Continuous remimazolam infusion was initiated, but within ten minutes the patient developed chest discomfort followed by abrupt hypotension and oxygen desaturation, requiring urgent conversion to general anesthesia. Following a remimazolam bolus and rocuronium administration, sudden cardiac arrest occurred. Return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was achieved after approximately 28 min of cardiopulmonary resuscitation with a cumulative intravenous epinephrine dose of approximately 17 mg, and veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) was required. Post-ROSC transesophageal echocardiography demonstrated a transient anteroseptal regional wall motion abnormality; subsequent coronary angiography demonstrated no significant coronary disease, and computed tomography pulmonary angiography was negative for embolism, leaving acute hypersensitivity as the most plausible mechanism. Acute serum tryptase was elevated at 11.6 µg/L and normalized to 3.4 µg/L (the patient's individual baseline) prior to discharge, satisfying the World Allergy Organization (WAO) criterion. A skin prick test performed four weeks later was positive for remimazolam and negative for rocuronium and the other coadministered agents. An expanded multi-database literature review identified 16 prior cases of remimazolam-induced anaphylaxis. Most described cardiovascular collapse as the predominant manifestation. To our knowledge, based on available literature, this is among the first reports of remimazolam-induced anaphylaxis occurring in the setting of high spinal anesthesia with sympathetic blockade. Vigilance and adherence to established anaphylaxis management guidelines are essential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.