ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
Orthodontic Treatment in Idiopathic Root Resorption: A Narrative Review and a Clinical Case Report.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Idiopathic root resorption is diagnosed when external root resorption occurs in the absence of an identifiable etiological factor. Two main forms are described in the literature: apical and cervical. Owing to the rarity of this condition and the limited number of published reports, evidence-based recommendations for orthodontic management are currently lacking. The aim of this study was to provide a narrative overview of published case reports describing orthodontic procedures performed in patients with idiopathic root resorption and to supplement the available literature with a detailed clinical case. A case of a 7-year-7-month-old female patient presenting with generalized idiopathic root resorption and a concomitant skeletal Class III malocclusion is described. In this patient, skeletal anchorage was used to support maxillary protraction in an attempt to obtain an orthopedic effect. The literature review had a narrative character and was based on a structured search of the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases covering the period from January 2010 to December 2025. Only English-language case reports meeting strict eligibility criteria were considered. Of 47 records initially identified, two fulfilled the inclusion criteria; an additional two case reports were retrieved through manual searching. Conclusions: Given that the available evidence is limited to isolated case reports and a single clinical observation, the present findings do not allow for reliable conclusions regarding the safety, effectiveness, or general applicability of orthodontic treatment in patients with idiopathic root resorption. Clinical management should therefore be individualized, with careful documentation and close radiological follow-up. Further well-documented clinical reports are required to better characterize treatment-related risks in this patient group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.