ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Evaluating the Impact of a National Telehealth Outpatient Mental Health Program in Rural Communities.
Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesLimited data exist on care delivery, engagement, and clinical outcomes among rural populations accessing telehealth mental health services, particularly within integrated psychotherapy-and-psychiatry models. This retrospective observational 12-week cohort study aimed to examine access, engagement, and preliminary clinical outcomes for rural and non-rural patients receiving services through a national outpatient telehealth mental health program. Engagement and clinical outcomes were expected to be comparable among rural and non-rural patients.
methodsDescriptive and inferential analyses were conducted to examine access to care, engagement, and changes in depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, and suicidal ideation among rural and non-rural patients receiving telehealth mental health services over a 12-week treatment period. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7). The full sample included 8354 rural and 177,864 non-rural patients and was used to assess access and engagement in treatment. A clinical sample (rural
resultsRural patients demonstrated greater baseline symptom severity and medical complexity relative to non-rural patients. Mean time to first appointment was 5.2 days among rural patients and 5.5 days among non-rural patients, with comparable engagement across groups and rural patients averaging approximately 1-2 touch points per week in care. Patient satisfaction ratings averaged 4.9 out of 5. Within the clinical sample, rural patients demonstrated clinically meaningful symptom improvement across depression and anxiety outcomes. Mean PHQ-9 scores improved by 7.0 points (95% CI: 6.72-7.28), and mean GAD-7 scores improved by 6.1 points (95% CI: 5.83-6.37). Additionally, 70.5% of rural patients achieved a minimal clinically important difference in PHQ-9 or GAD-7 scores, and 66.7% of patients reporting suicidal ideation at baseline no longer endorsed suicidal ideation at endline.
conclusionsThese findings support the feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of large-scale virtual mental health care models for rural populations. Rural patients demonstrated engagement and clinical outcomes comparable to non-rural patients despite greater baseline severity and medical complexity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.