ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare Administration and Clinical Informatics: A Critical Review and Governance Roadmap.
Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Home-Care and Community Nursing: A Scoping Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Digital Health Revolution in Saudi Arabia: A Narrative Review of Healthcare Transformation.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly influencing healthcare administration and clinical informatics by supporting disease diagnosis, clinical decision-making, treatment personalization, drug discovery, remote monitoring, public health surveillance, and hospital operations. However, the successful adoption of AI in healthcare depends not only on algorithmic performance, but also on its safe integration into clinical information systems, organizational workflows, and governance structures. This article presents a narrative critical review of recent advances in AI-driven healthcare, with a focus on four major domains: AI-enabled disease diagnosis, treatment personalization and clinical decision support, drug discovery and biomedical knowledge generation, and healthcare administration. Evidence from radiology, pathology, ophthalmology, dermatology, and cardiology shows that AI systems can achieve strong diagnostic performance in selected settings, while applications in electronic health records, natural language processing, telemedicine, and predictive analytics are increasingly used to support healthcare delivery and operational decision-making. At the same time, important barriers continue to limit real-world implementation, including fragmented data infrastructures, limited interoperability, poor data quality, algorithmic bias, lack of explainability, privacy and cybersecurity risks, unclear accountability, and insufficient external validation. This review critically examines these challenges and proposes a governance-oriented roadmap for responsible AI integration in healthcare administration and clinical informatics. The proposed roadmap emphasizes data readiness, model validation, workflow integration, institutional accountability, post-deployment monitoring, and workforce readiness. The findings suggest that AI can contribute to more efficient, accessible, and patient-centered healthcare only when it is implemented within trustworthy medical informatics ecosystems supported by ethical governance, human oversight, and continuous evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.