ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2026
AI-Based Imaging Assessment of Body Composition in Oncology: A Step Toward Routine Clinical Practice Integration.
Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Digital Nutritional Care in Oncology: Opportunities to Enhance Quality of Life and Support Patient-Centered Care.Cancers · 2026Review
- Integration of sarcopenia screening into radiotherapy planning: Validation of a time-efficient SMI measurement method using MIM software in prostate cancer.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In oncology, body composition (BC) provides clinically meaningful information beyond body mass index, capturing muscle and adipose tissue alterations associated with survival, treatment tolerance, surgical complications and quality of life. Although routine oncologic imaging is widely available, BC assessment remains poorly integrated into daily clinical practice, largely because conventional imaging-based approaches require time-consuming manual analyses, dedicated software and specialized expertise. Artificial intelligence (AI), particularly deep learning-based image segmentation, may automate BC analysis and generate rapid, reproducible, and scalable estimates from routinely acquired imaging, without increasing clinical workload. This opinion paper aims to examine AI-based BC analysis as a potential strategy to integrate BC into routine oncology workflows, outlining its potential clinical benefits and the aspects that need to be addressed before widespread implementation. AI-based BC analysis may improve nutritional assessment, refine clinical and nutritional risk stratification, and help identify patients at increased risk of treatment-related toxicity. In perspective, BC data may also support more personalized nutritional and physical activity interventions and contribute to muscle mass-informed anticancer treatment dosing strategies. Several gaps still limit its clinical implementation, including the need of robust external validation, standardized acquisition and analytical protocols, clinically meaningful cut-offs and ethical, and regulatory and data governance frameworks. AI-based BC analysis is therefore a promising but still evolving approach that may help translate BC from a prognostic marker into a clinically actionable tool in oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.