ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Chemical Motifs Associated with FAERS-Derived Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reaction Disproportionality Signals: An Interpretable Pharmacovigilance-Driven Cheminformatics Study.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs) are rare, life-threatening drug hypersensitivity syndromes. Although pharmacovigilance can identify drugs disproportionately reported with SCARs, it does not reveal which local chemistries recur among them. To address this, we assessed whether drugs with FAERS-derived SCAR disproportionality signals share interpretable chemical motifs. We screened FAERS data from 2004Q1 to 2024Q3, identified 5523 drugs with available Simplified Molecular-Input Line-Entry System (SMILES) representations, and constructed a signal-enriched dataset of 1676 compounds with nominally significant broad-SCAR associations after excluding predefined therapeutic/supportive confounders. Compounds were assigned to positive-signal [natural logarithm of reporting odds ratio (lnROR) > 0,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.