ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Integrating Genome-Scale Metabolic Modeling with Machine Learning Improves Gene Essentiality Prediction in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) poses a significant therapeutic challenge owing to its aggressiveness and limited treatment options. Here, we integrated genome-scale metabolic modeling with machine learning to improve gene essentiality prediction and identify candidate therapeutic targets for TNBC. Cell-line-specific genome-scale metabolic models were reconstructed for 50 breast cancer cell lines using RNA-sequencing from Cancer Dependency Map (DepMap). Metabolic reaction flux distributions derived from minimization of metabolic adjustment (MOMA) were used as features to train a random forest classifier, with DepMap gene dependency scores as ground truth labels. This integrative approach outperformed the MOMA alone for gene essentiality prediction, increasing sensitivity from 0.37 to 0.55. The model identified 57 TNBC-specific essential genes, including Enolase 1 (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.