ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Translational Assessment of Omics Approaches in Endometriosis: Bridging Molecular Discovery with Clinical Utility.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Endometriosis affects an estimated 5-10% of women of reproductive age and presents with substantial clinical and biological heterogeneity. Recent clinical guidelines have shifted toward symptom-guided diagnosis supported by expert imaging, moving away from mandatory diagnostic laparoscopy and redefining the evidentiary standards for evaluating new diagnostic technologies. Advances across omics domains, including genomics, epigenomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, extracellular vesicle profiling, microbiome research, and multi-omics integration, have deepened understanding of lesion biology, immune dysregulation, metabolic alterations, and progesterone resistance. However, translation of these molecular insights into clinically actionable tools remains limited. Most candidate biomarkers remain at discovery or internal/developer-led validation stages, constrained by small sample sizes, heterogeneous analytical platforms, incomplete control of confounding variables, and limited independent multicenter validation. In this review, we apply a four-tier evidence-maturity framework, spanning discovery, internal or developer-led validation, independent external validation, and demonstrated clinical utility, to classify omics-based diagnostic, prognostic, and treatment-response applications in endometriosis. We also distinguish potential clinical roles, including triage, adjunctive testing, and replacement-test evaluation, each requiring different validation standards and performance thresholds. Salivary microRNA currently represents the most clinically advanced diagnostic omics candidate, but the available evidence remains developer-led and is best classified as advanced Tier 2/Tier 2+ rather than independent Tier 3 validation. Prognostic and treatment-response applications are less mature and remain discovery-stage because prospective patient-level longitudinal validation and biomarker-stratified treatment trials are lacking. Overall, no omics-derived biomarker has yet achieved independent Tier 3 validation or Tier 4 readiness for routine clinical implementation. At present, omics approaches should be regarded primarily as research and translational prioritization tools rather than determinants of routine clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.