ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
ARumenamides as Multitarget Ion Channel Modulators: Insights from Fenestration-Focused Docking, ADMET Profiling, and Molecular Dynamics.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Voltage-gated ion channels are central regulators of cardiac, neuronal, and skeletal muscle excitability, and their dysfunction underlies a wide spectrum of channelopathies, including arrhythmias and neuromuscular disorders. While conventional ion channel therapeutics typically target a single pore-binding site, emerging evidence supports the therapeutic potential of polypharmacological compounds capable of modulating multiple channel subtypes. ARumenamides represent a novel class of sulfonamide-based ligands originally identified as fenestration-targeting sodium channel modulators; however, their cross-family binding mechanisms and multitarget potential remain incompletely defined. Here, we employed an integrated structure-based computational workflow combining molecular docking, in silico ADMET profiling, and long-timescale (250 ns) molecular dynamics simulations to systematically evaluate 20 ARumenamide derivatives across 15 voltage-gated sodium, calcium, and potassium channel structures. Docking analyses revealed broad multitarget binding profiles, with several compounds exhibiting high predicted affinity across cardiac, neuronal, and skeletal muscle channel isoforms. ADMET predictions demonstrated favorable intestinal absorption and metabolic safety for most candidates, although solubility and mutagenicity liabilities were identified for select derivatives. Detailed molecular dynamics simulations of prioritized compounds (AR-310, AR-769, and AR-946) uncovered site-specific binding behaviors and conformational effects. AR-769 exhibited exceptional stability at both fenestration and central pore sites of Cav1.2, associated with persistent hydrogen-bond networks, reduced protein flexibility, and a well-defined free energy minimum. In contrast, AR-310 and AR-946 displayed selective stability within Nav1.4 fenestrations and the Kv4.3 central pore, respectively, highlighting how subtle chemical features bias binding site preference and dynamic retention. Collectively, these findings establish a structure-dynamics framework for rational design of ARumenamide-based multitarget ion channel modulators. Our results demonstrate that fenestration-focused binding can support sustained ligand engagement without obligatory pore occlusion, offering a mechanistically distinct strategy for developing next-generation polypharmacological therapeutics for cardiac and neuromuscular disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.