ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Extracellular Vesicles in Endometriosis: A Comprehensive Review of Biological Insights and Methodological Challenges.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Do Oxidative Stress-Modified Exosomes Contribute to Infertility in Endometriosis?International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endometriosis is a complex disorder associated with dysregulated immune, hormonal, and microenvironmental signaling. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are important mediators of intercellular communication and may contribute to disease pathogenesis, biomarker discovery, and therapeutic targeting. Here, we systematically reviewed the literature on EVs in endometriosis, focusing on EV classification, isolation and characterization methods, and the functional relevance of EV-associated cargo. A total of 50 original studies were included and evaluated in the context of current International Society for Extracellular Vesicles (ISEV) recommendations. Our analysis revealed marked heterogeneity in EV nomenclature, biological sources, and methodological approaches. Although most studies used standard EV markers, the assessment of sample purity and inclusion of negative controls was inconsistent. Further studies using standardized workflows and well-characterized cohorts are needed to clarify their biological and clinical significance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.