Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42278178›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026

Composting Dynamics, Bedding Properties, and Seasonal Effects in Composting and Non-Composting Bedded-Pack Barns in a Subtropical Region.

Beatriz Danieli, Maksuel Gatto de Vitt, Fábio José Gomes Bertipaglia, Juliano Vitória Domingues, Aline Zampar, Maria Luísa Appendino Nunes Zotti, Patrícia Ferreira Ponciano Ferraz, Ana Luiza Bachmann Schogor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Beatriz DanieliGraduate Program in Animal Science, Santa Catarina State University (UDESC), Chapecó 89815-630, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2484-5836
Maksuel Gatto de VittGraduate Program in Animal Science, Santa Catarina State University (UDESC), Chapecó 89815-630, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3989-8554
Fábio José Gomes BertipagliaDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of West Santa Catarina, Campos Novos 89620-000, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1903-4898
Juliano Vitória DominguesInstituto do Meio Ambiente de Santa Catarina (IMA/SC), Chapecó 89802-120, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0001-1442
Aline ZamparGraduate Program in Animal Science, Santa Catarina State University (UDESC), Chapecó 89815-630, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2269-7932
Maria Luísa Appendino Nunes ZottiGraduate Program in Animal Science, Santa Catarina State University (UDESC), Chapecó 89815-630, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5963-6714
Patrícia Ferreira Ponciano FerrazDepartment of Agricultural Engineering, Federal University of Lavras (UFLA), Lavras 37200-000, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9708-0259
Ana Luiza Bachmann SchogorGraduate Program in Animal Science, Santa Catarina State University (UDESC), Chapecó 89815-630, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8952-8869

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 428853/2016-1Coordenação de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior Finance Code 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of construction design and seasonal climatic conditions on bedding dynamics in bedded-pack dairy systems with contrasting composting functionality. The study intentionally included systems representing both composting bedded-pack barns (CBP), characterized by active management (regular turning and ventilation), and non-composting bedded-pack barns (BPB), which lacked aeration and did not promote active composting, resulting in limited or absent composting activity. Nine farms were divided into three groups: CONV (large, full-time CBP), ADAP (adapted, full-time CBP), and PART (partially used BPB). Evaluations were conducted during both cold and hot seasons. Composting dynamics were assessed over 24 h by measuring bedding temperature and moisture at eight points. During daytime, additional measurements at twenty points allowed for spatial distribution analysis using the inverse distance weighting method. Bedding attributes-including pH, density, depth, and particle size-were also measured in eight points. A 2 × 3 factorial design (two seasons, three barn types) was applied, and data were analyzed using Tukey's test and Pearson correlation. Microclimate conditions were monitored through air temperature and humidity. Bedding temperature was significantly higher in the hot season (36.55 °C) compared to the cold season (32.12 °C), and was highest in the ADAP group (40.01 °C), followed by CONV (37.39 °C) and PART (26.18 °C) (

Indexed as

bedding temperaturecomposting dynamicsdairy cowsseasonal climate variation

Identifiers

PMID42278178
PMCPMC13255618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.