ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026
Mapping Variability in Bovine Respiratory Disease Risk Factors in Beef Production Systems: A Scoping Review.
Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This scoping review examines bovine respiratory disease (BRD) risk factors across beef production systems to clarify their contribution to disease occurrence and outcomes and to identify gaps that limit effective prevention. Following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines, eight databases (EBSCOhost, Google Scholar, MDPI, PubMed, ScienceDirect, Journal of Animal Science, Journal of Dairy Science, and Web of Science) were searched for peer-reviewed studies published between 2004 and 2024, yielding 91 eligible studies from 133 screened articles. Data were charted to assess how BRD risk factors have been investigated across cow-calf, stocker/backgrounding, and feedlot systems and categorized into biological, operational, and environmental domains. Twenty-three major risk factors were identified, with transportation stress and commingling most frequently studied in stocker and feedlot systems, while management-related factors such as vaccination were more commonly emphasized in cow-calf operations. The evidence base was heavily skewed toward feedlot populations (62%), with limited focus on cow-calf (13%) and stocker (7%) systems and few longitudinal studies spanning multiple production stages. Overall, the findings reveal substantial heterogeneity in research emphasis and highlight critical gaps in early-life and cross-stage risk assessment. These findings underscore an urgent need for longitudinal, cross-stage cohort studies and standardized BRD surveillance frameworks to address the early-life evidence gap and provide a foundation for more effective, data-driven, integrated disease prevention strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.