ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026
Forest Conversion Drives Divergent Responses in Bird and Mammal Diversity: Stand Structure Matters for Birds, Elevation for Mammals.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Forest conversion from natural forests to secondary forests and plantations has significantly altered wildlife habitats in subtropical regions. However, the drivers of disparities in bird and mammal multidimensional diversity between these forest types remain poorly understood. We analyzed a four-year camera-trapping dataset to compare the taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic diversity and community structure of birds and mammals. Our results indicated that forest conversion impacts biodiversity differently across taxa. Birds exhibited higher taxonomic and phylogenetic diversity in secondary forests than in plantations. A similar pattern was also evident for birds among different stand types. However, mammals exhibited considerable taxonomic diversity but showed higher phylogenetic diversity and structure in secondary forests. A similar pattern was also evident for mammals among different stand types. Beta diversity revealed significant differences in bird taxonomic composition and mammal phylogenetic composition between secondary and plantation forests. Furthermore, elevation primarily influenced bird taxonomic diversity, phylogenetic diversity and structure in secondary forests, whereas mammal functional diversity, phylogenetic diversity and structure were more sensitive to elevational changes in both secondary and plantation forests. These findings reveal that birds and mammals respond distinctively to forest conversion. We emphasize that management strategies must be group-specific. For birds, we recommend prioritizing the preservation of secondary forests as biodiversity refugia and transforming structurally simplified plantations into complex habitats by retaining legacy trees and native understory vegetation. For mammals, conservation should prioritize landscape-scale connectivity by protecting continuous forest corridors along altitudinal gradients. Practically, this requires restricting further fragmentation of high-altitude habitats and restoring native vegetation in degraded corridors to facilitate dispersal and maintain the phylogenetic integrity of mammal communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.