ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026
A Provisional Conceptual Framework for Mucosal Colour Assessment in Terrestrial Mammals.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mucosal colour assessment is widely used in veterinary medicine as an indicator of physiological states, but current approaches are characterized by inconsistent terminology, variable methodology, and differing levels of validation. This communication introduces the provisional Uldahl Standard, a conceptual framework developed to improve consistency, transparency, and reproducibility in mucosal colour assessment in terrestrial mammals. The framework integrates principles from veterinary medicine, colorimetry, and modern imaging technologies, combining perceptual, computational, and instrument-based approaches to colour analysis. Mucosal colour assessment is defined as a multidimensional process comprising colour category, light saturation level, physiological association, assessment method, and level of validation. Nine principal colour categories and eight standardised saturation modifiers were identified through a literature review and incorporated into the framework. The standard further emphasizes transparent reporting of assessment conditions, validation procedures, artefact evaluation, and analytical pathways, including examples using AI-assisted visual analysis. The framework acknowledges the inherent variability in mucosal colour assessment arising from environmental conditions, limitations of human colour perception, and differences in descriptive methods while providing a structured and comparable terminology, linked to defined levels of validation. It is anticipated that application of the proposed Uldahl Standard will provide markedly more robust and consistent descriptions of mucosal colours, which, provided they are combined with well validated clinical signs of the underlying physiology and/or pathophysiology, will greatly enhance the diagnostic power of the procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.