ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026
Effectiveness of the Anatomage Table Vet Prior to Cadaveric Dissection of Dog's Thoracic Limb Muscles: A Preliminary Assessment and Student Learning Outcomes.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Anatomage Table Vet (ATV) is a digital tool that may facilitate the understanding of complex structures and improve visuospatial skills. This study evaluated the effectiveness of the ATV as a review method prior to cadaveric dissection and collected students' feedback. During a sport-medicine seminar, consisting of an oral presentation and a practical anatomy review session, a small sample of veterinary students voluntarily participated in this trial. A pre-test assessed baseline knowledge on muscle identification, muscle insertions and origins and biomechanics. Twenty-nine students were divided into two groups, ATV (A) and traditional lecture (C), to review canine anatomy of the caninethoracic limb and cingulum, before compiling a post-test, represented by muscle identification on five cadaveric specimens. A feedback questionnaire was administered afterwards. Mean post-test scores were significantly higher in both groups in all subsections and total score (A pre = 2.40; A post = 6.60; C pre = 2.43; C post = 6.57). No significant difference was observed in improvement between groups. Student feedback was generally positive. From the results limited to this preliminary assessment, the ATV seems well-received by students. Further research with a larger sample size is needed to clarify its educational impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.