Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42278119›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026

Surveillance of Parvovirus in Free-Roaming Dogs in the Qinling Mountains and Assessment of the Risk of Cross-Species Transmission to Giant Pandas.

Zhiyang Huang, U Cheong, Zichen Liu, Jiao He, Leigang Zhao, Dapeng Zhu, Haojie Xu, Yuhan Tsai, Jingjie Wei, Zhonghao Dan and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Zhiyang HuangCollege of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.ORCID 0009-0002-4032-300X
U CheongCollege of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Zichen LiuCollege of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0807-9801
Jiao HeCollege of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Leigang ZhaoFoping National Nature Reserve Administration, Foping County, Hanzhong 723400, China.
Dapeng ZhuFoping National Nature Reserve Administration, Foping County, Hanzhong 723400, China.
Haojie XuCollege of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Yuhan TsaiCollege of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Jingjie WeiCollege of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Zhonghao DanFoping National Nature Reserve Administration, Foping County, Hanzhong 723400, China.
Bolong LuFoping National Nature Reserve Administration, Foping County, Hanzhong 723400, China.
Yipeng JinCollege of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5244-8358

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To assess the risk of cross-species transmission of canine parvovirus (CPV) from free-roaming dogs to wild giant pandas in the Foping National Nature Reserve, we collected rectal swabs and serum samples from dogs and fecal samples from giant pandas seasonally (August 2024-August 2025), combined with population surveys and GPS home-range tracking. Vaccination coverage declined from 54.2% to 36.4%, while the proportion of susceptible dogs rose from 8.7% to 29.5%. The CPV nucleic acid positive rate in dogs was 3.9% (4/102, all sub-adults, three deaths), whereas all giant panda samples were negative. Based on individual-seasonal exposure, the serum exposure rate was 30.4%, with immature dogs at significantly higher risk than adults (OR = 5.37). Home-range overlap between dogs and giant pandas (95% KDE: 19.17% in cold seasons vs. 2.61% in warm seasons) and encounter probability were markedly higher in winter and spring. Canine-derived CPV strains possessed the molecular potential to infect giant pandas. In summary, CPV persists long-term in free-roaming dog populations, summer vaccination has not established an effective immune barrier, and winter-spring is a high-risk window for cross-species transmission. We recommend enhanced winter-spring immunization, spatial control measures, and quarantine protocols for incoming dogs.

Indexed as

canine parvoviruscross-species transmissionfree-roaming dogsgiant pandahome range overlapseroepidemiologyvaccination coveragewildlife disease

Identifiers

PMID42278119
PMCPMC13255924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.