Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42278100›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026

Occupational Exposure and Economic Inequity Along a Game Meat Trade Network in Cross River State, Nigeria.

Katharine E T Thompson, Christian E Herrera, Wilfred A Ayambem, Alobi O Alobi, Nzube M Ifebueme, Oshama M Otukpa, Tomilola F Aderibigbe, Matthew R Keenan, Sagan R Friant

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Katharine E T ThompsonDepartment of Anthropology, Pennsylvania State University, 228 Susan Welch Building, University Park, PA 16802, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5892-536X
Christian E HerreraDepartment of Anthropology, Pennsylvania State University, 228 Susan Welch Building, University Park, PA 16802, USA.ORCID 0009-0001-1268-1726
Wilfred A AyambemDepartment of Forestry and Wildlife Resources Management, University of Calabar, Calabar 540281, Nigeria.
Alobi O AlobiDepartment of Forestry and Wildlife Resources Management, University of Calabar, Calabar 540281, Nigeria.
Nzube M IfebuemeDepartment of Forestry and Wildlife Resources Management, University of Calabar, Calabar 540281, Nigeria.
Oshama M OtukpaDepartment of Forestry and Wildlife Resources Management, University of Calabar, Calabar 540281, Nigeria.
Tomilola F AderibigbeDepartment of Forestry and Wildlife Resources Management, University of Calabar, Calabar 540281, Nigeria.
Matthew R KeenanDepartment of Anthropology, Pennsylvania State University, 228 Susan Welch Building, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
Sagan R FriantDepartment of Anthropology, Pennsylvania State University, 228 Susan Welch Building, University Park, PA 16802, USA.

Funding

Pennsylvania State University NAPrimate Conservation 273928
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Game meat supply chains create variable safety risks and economic benefits across traders, yet research often focuses on hunters or consumers while overlooking meat preparation and processing roles. This study examines how zoonotic disease exposure, precautionary behaviors, and economic returns vary across hunters, vendors, and restaurant workers within the game meat trade in Cross River State, Nigeria. Between January 2023 and April 2024, we conducted 91 annual and 760 monthly interviews with 91 actors, including hunters, vendors, and restaurant workers, documenting handling practices, hygienic precautions, risk perceptions, and income derived from the game meat trade. Hunters reported the highest levels of direct contact with high-risk meat states and the lowest use of hygienic precautions. Vendors generated higher income than other actors, while hunters reported lower economic dependence on game meat than either vendors or restaurants. These findings demonstrate that game meat safety risks and livelihood benefits are distributed unevenly across value chains. Recognizing these asymmetries is essential for designing food safety interventions and policies that protect public health and anticipate differential impacts on livelihoods.

Indexed as

bushmeatfood safetymarket dynamicssupply chainWest Africazoonotic disease

Identifiers

PMID42278100
PMCPMC13255818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.