ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026
Behavioral Indicators of Heat Stress in Dairy Cows Under Subtropical Conditions: Comparison of Milking Systems.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding behavioral responses of dairy cows to thermal load under different milking-system environments is essential for welfare monitoring in subtropical production systems, yet field-based evidence remains limited. This study compared heat-related behavioral responses between an automated milking system (AMS) and a conventional parlor system under commercial subtropical conditions, with the hypothesis that cows in the AMS would exhibit more stable and less variable behavioral patterns under heat stress. Panting, feeding, and rumination were continuously monitored and analyzed at the barn level in relation to the temperature-humidity index (THI). The AMS barn showed lower panting duration and reduced day-to-day variability, whereas the traditional barn exhibited higher panting levels and greater short-term fluctuations. Panting increased consistently with THI, showing a clear temporal trend (β ≈ 0.65 min/day), and emerged as the most sensitive indicator of thermal load, while feeding and rumination showed weaker responses. During heatwaves, panting increased markedly in both systems, with limited changes in feeding and rumination. Multivariate analyses (PCA) showed more compact clustering in the AMS barn, with higher variance explained along the first principal component (PC1 ≈ 44%), compared to greater dispersion in the traditional barn. These findings demonstrate that cows managed in the AMS exhibited more stable and less variable behavioral patterns under heat stress, whereas cows in the conventional parlor system showed higher panting levels and greater short-term fluctuations. These system-level differences directly address the study objective and support panting as a practical indicator for heat-stress monitoring in subtropical dairy systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.