ArticleAmerican journal of botany2026
Evidence of introgression amid phylogenetic conflict in Brachyotum, a plant radiation from the Tropical Andes.
Article in American journal of botany, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
premiseThe species-rich flora of Tropical Andes underwent multiple rapid and recent diversifications, yet resolving their evolutionary histories remains challenging despite increasing phylogenomic data. Here, we examined phylogenomic conflict in Brachyotum (Melastomataceae) to identify sources preventing its resolution.
methodsWe sequenced multiple nuclear loci through target capture and plastid loci through genome skimming for approximately two thirds of Brachyotum species. We analyzed nuclear loci with concatenated maximum-likelihood, multispecies coalescent (MSC), and phylogenetic network approaches, whereas plastid loci were analyzed with a concatenated maximum-likelihood.
resultsTopological conflict was widespread among gene trees. Brachyotum was inferred as monophyletic by concatenated nuclear and ASTRAL approaches, but as paraphyletic by BEAST and phylogenetic network analyses, the latter involving four introgression events. Plastid analyses also recovered paraphyly. Across analyses, the backbone of Brachyotum showed low branch support, and individual nuclear loci yielded markedly divergent topologies across inference methods.
conclusionsDespite pervasive gene tree discordance, the signal for multiple introgression events is robust. Cytonuclear discordance between plastid and nuclear data further supports introgression. Our results suggest that current phylogenomic approaches may not fully capture the evolutionary complexity of Brachyotum, a challenge that may extend to other rapid Andean plant radiations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.