ArticleThe Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences2026
The Prognostic Value of EDRIC and Its Association With Radiation-Induced Lymphopenia in Patients With Esophageal Cancer Undergoing Radical Radiotherapy: A Single-Center Chinese Study.
Article in The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of the estimated dose of radiation to immune cells (EDRIC) in patients with esophageal cancer receiving radical radiotherapy. We retrospectively reviewed the data of patients with esophageal cancer who underwent definitive radiotherapy at our institution. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to assess the survival curves. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to identify the prognostic factors associated with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Additionally, binary logistic regression analyses were used to identify factors associated with severe lymphopenia. A total of 166 patients, with a median follow-up duration of 59 months, were evaluated. The median EDRIC was 7.23 Gy. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 81.9%, 49.4%, and 33.7% in the EDRIC < 7.23 Gy group, compared with 62.7%, 21.7%, and 19.3% in the EDRIC ≥ 7.23 Gy group (p < 0.001). Prognostic analysis identified Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, TNM stage, treatment, EDRIC, and lymphopenia as significant independent prognostic factors of OS (p < 0.05). Higher EDRIC, N stage, and lymphopenia were identified as independent risk factors for PFS. Logistic regression analysis indicated that treatment and EDRIC were significantly associated with severe lymphopenia (p < 0.05). EDRIC serves not only as a prognostic marker for radical radiotherapy in esophageal cancer, but also as a potential biomarker for radiation-induced lymphopenia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.