Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42277969›Full record

ArticleImplementation science communications2026

The roads towards fidelity: a mixed-method study of mechanisms of a multifaceted implementation strategy to improve implementation of a guideline for the prevention of mental Ill-health at the workplace in a school setting.

Andreas Rödlund, Rebecca Lengnick-Hall, Anna Toropova, Byron J Powell, Liselotte Schäfer Elinder, Christina Björklund, Lydia Kwak

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05019937 (A Randomized Controlled Trial in Schools Aimed at Testing the Effectiveness of Implementation Strategies, Including Mechanism of Change, on Adherence to the Guideline for the Prevention of Common Mental Disorders at the Workplace.), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05019937 nacompletednot on this map

A Randomized Controlled Trial in Schools Aimed at Testing the Effectiveness of Implementation Strategies, Including Mechanism of Change, on Adherence to the Guideline for the Prevention of Common Mental Disorders at the Workplace.

TypeinterventionalSponsorLydia KwakRan2021 to 2023Enrolled2,276ConditionsMental Disorder, StressArmsEducational meeting, Implementation team, Workshops, Plan-Do-Study-Act improvement cycles, Internal facilitator
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Andreas RödlundUnit of Intervention and Implementation Research for Worker Health, Institute for Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, 171 77, Sweden. andreas.rodlund@ki.se.
Rebecca Lengnick-HallCenter for Mental Health Services Research, Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Anna ToropovaUnit of Intervention and Implementation Research for Worker Health, Institute for Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, 171 77, Sweden.
Byron J PowellCenter for Mental Health Services Research, Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Liselotte Schäfer ElinderDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, 171 77, Sweden.
Christina BjörklundUnit of Intervention and Implementation Research for Worker Health, Institute for Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, 171 77, Sweden.
Lydia KwakUnit of Intervention and Implementation Research for Worker Health, Institute for Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, 171 77, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany implementation studies focus on assessing the effectiveness of implementation strategies without investigating the mechanisms explaining their effects. This study investigates the specific mechanisms through which a multifaceted implementation strategy is hypothesized to improve guideline fidelity. This is done by tracing the specific mechanisms through which each discrete strategy achieved proximal outcomes that precede guideline fidelity.

methodsProcess tracing with comparative case studies was used to analyze qualitative data from a subsample of 16 implementers participating in a cluster-randomized controlled trial exploring the mechanisms by which a multifaceted strategy affects fidelity to a guideline for prevention of mental problems in schools. The study involved four steps: (1) Organizing a traceable process theory of change; (2) Gathering data to validate, modify, or expand the theory; (3) Coding data through qualitative content analysis; and (4) Causal analysis to articulate the theory's mechanisms, including temporal order and key contextual conditions that explain success or failure. The unit of analysis was implementers who were members of the schools' implementation teams, with each implementer representing a case.

resultsThe analyses illuminated distinct pathways that explain how each of the five discrete strategies led to implementation success. (1) Organizing Implementation Teams enabled participation in implementation activities, as principals created an environment with dedicated resources, enabling social influences; (2) Educational meetings influenced the decision to implement the guideline through the educators' who promoted knowledge acquisition among the implementers and shaped their beliefs about the implementation; (3) Ongoing Training influenced the intention for implementation and enactment of activities through educators' engaged processes around ongoing acquisition and refinement of skills, which gradually built belief in implementation capability; (4) Small Cyclical Tests of Change influenced behavioral regulation as the workshops engaged repeated engagement in goal setting, action planning, reflection, and adjustment; (5) Facilitation supported implementers' goal setting and prioritization by creating an environmental context, enabling implementers' social influence through receiving social support from facilitators. Unsuccessful pathways for each strategy were also identified and explained.

conclusionsThis study traced the specific sequences of actions and interactions through which five discrete implementation strategies contributed to guideline implementation. The findings illustrate how the mechanisms of the multifaceted strategy can be successfully engaged and why they may fail under certain conditions.

trial registrationThe trial was registered the 9th of August 2021 at Clinicaltrials.gov with Trial registration number: NCT05019937.

Indexed as

Evidence-based practiceImplementation strategiesMechanisms of changeMental health problemsProcess tracingPsychosocial risk managementQualitative comparison analysisTheory-based evaluation methods

Identifiers

PMID42277969
PMCPMC13261927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.