SynthesisBMC psychology2026
Extreme sensory processing in high intellectual potential individuals : a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSensitivity has been described as a characteristic of individuals with High Intellectual Potential (HIP). However, extreme sensory processing, manifesting as heightened or diminished responsiveness to sensory input, has not yet been the subject of a dedicated systematic review. This systematic review aims to critically examine and synthesize existing studies on extreme sensory processing among HIP individuals, with particular attention to theoretical frameworks, assessment tools, and methodological quality.
methodsThis review was conducted in compliance with PRISMA guidelines. An updated search was performed in December 2024 using the following keywords: "sensory", "sensitivity" and "high intelligence" or "gifted" in the Pubmed, Web of Science, PsycINFO, PsycArticle, ScienceDirect and Scopus databases. The included articles specifically examined sensory processing in response to internal or external stimuli.
resultsOf the 739 articles screened, 21 were eligible and 5 studies ultimately met the inclusion criteria. The studies exhibit conceptual heterogeneity, utilizing diverse theoretical frameworks. While some studies report differences in sensory reactivity, these findings are not convergent and largely depend on the heterogeneity of the theoretical frameworks, constructs, and measurement tools used, which limits their interpretability and comparability. There is a lack of consistent evidence supporting the existence of a generalized or extreme sensory processing profile in HIP populations. Methodological limitations, including a lack of control for neurodevelopmental comorbidities, and variability in participant characteristics, further limit the generalizability of the findings.
conclusionThe literature does not support the hypothesis that individuals with HIP exhibit extreme sensory processing. The theoretical and methodological variability observed across studies makes it difficult to draw unified conclusions. Future research should adopt standardized methodologies, provide clear cognitive characterizations, and control for confounding variables to clarify the sensory processing patterns in HIP individuals.
trial registrationPROSPERO registration number CRD42024629219.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.