Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42277962›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2026

Changing the narrative: stories reduce biases against anomalous faces.

Nadir Bilici, Mariola Paruzel-Czachura, Clifford I Workman, Stacey Humphries, Roy H Hamilton, Anjan Chatterjee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nadir BiliciDepartment of Neurology, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, USA.
Mariola Paruzel-CzachuraPenn Center for Neuroaesthetics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. mariola.paruzel-czachura@us.edu.pl.
Clifford I WorkmanDepartment of Psychological & Brain Sciences, University of Delaware, Delaware, USA.
Stacey HumphriesSchool of Mind, Body and Society, Goldsmiths University of London, London, UK.
Roy H HamiltonPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
Anjan ChatterjeePenn Center for Neuroaesthetics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Funding

The good, the bad, and the different: Understanding stigma towards people with facial differencesF32DE029407 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI WORKMAN, CLIFFORD I. · 2019 to 2021
$208k
NIDCR NIH HHS F32 DE029407the National Institute of Dental & Craniofacial Research of the National Institutes of Health F32DE029407
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Facial anomalies, such as scars, are often linked to an "anomalous-is-bad" stereotype, in which people with visible differences are seen as less warm or less moral. We developed the "Normalizing Anomalies with Mobile Exposure" (NAME) intervention based on the idea that repeated exposure and narratives can shift automatic evaluations of others. In a between-subjects design, one group of participants was repeatedly exposed to faces with visible anomalies paired with narratives describing morally praiseworthy actions, while a second group viewed phenotypically typical faces of people of color paired with the same type of narratives. Each group completed two daily sessions for five consecutive days via a mobile application. Across both versions of the intervention, implicit evaluations of the targeted faces became more positive over time, with the anomalous faces version showing the clearest target-specific improvement. Explicit attitudes did not change. These findings suggest that exposure-based storytelling can alter automatic evaluations of individuals with facial anomalies and may offer a promising, scalable approach to reducing stigma associated with visible differences, although further research is needed to test durability and generalizability to other groups.

Indexed as

Bias, ImplicitFaceFacial RecognitionNarrationSocial PerceptionStereotypingAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultAnomalous-is-badBeauty-is-goodFaceFace-readingImplicit bias

Identifiers

PMID42277962
PMCPMC13483554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.