Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42277933›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2026

Validation of the 2022 German trauma team activation criteria: a national registry study with focus on geriatric-specific modifiers.

P Faul, P Hagebusch, R Lefering, U Schweigkofler, M Münzberg, T Jakobi, D A Koch, Committee on Emergency Medicine, Intensive Care and Trauma Management (Sektion NIS) of the German Trauma Society (DGU)

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

P FaulDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, BG Unfallklinik Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. Philipp.Faul@BGU-Frankfurt.de.
P Hagebusch *Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, BG Unfallklinik Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
R LeferingInstitute for Research in Operative Medicine (IFOM), University Witten/Herdecke, Cologne, Germany.
U SchweigkoflerDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, BG Unfallklinik Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
M MünzbergDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, BG Unfallklinik Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
T JakobiDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, BG Unfallklinik Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
D A KochDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, BG Unfallklinik Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Committee on Emergency Medicine, Intensive Care and Trauma Management (Sektion NIS) of the German Trauma Society (DGU)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe 2022 revision of the German Trauma Society's (DGU) trauma team activation (TTA) criteria introduces geriatric-specific modifiers to enhance the sensitivity of risk stratification in older (elderly) trauma patients. This study evaluates the validity of these updated criteria using national registry data, with particular focus on mortality gradients across activation levels and the prognostic value of newly incorporated modifiers.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of patients aged ≥ 60 years, defined as elderly trauma patients, from the TraumaRegister DGU

resultsAmong 66,273 elderly trauma patients, mortality according to the 2022 criteria showed a consistent risk gradient: 20.2% (high risk of severe injury, HRSI), 9.0% (moderate risk of severe injury, MRSI), and 4.2% (None). In contrast, the 2016 criteria yielded inconsistent patterns, including higher mortality in the "None" category. New modifiers were strongly predictive of mortality: multiple serious injuries in ≥ 2 regions (16.7% vs. 6.7%), SBP 91-100 mmHg (13.1% vs. 7.3%), and GCS 13-14 (12.5% vs. 5.6%). Pre-injury anticoagulation was associated with increased mortality across all subgroups (29.3% vs. 20.3%).

conclusionThe 2022 TTA criteria improve the alignment between triage criteria and observed mortality risk, particularly among elderly patients. The addition of geriatric-specific modifiers enhances predictive accuracy and clinical applicability. Future work should quantify implications for overtriage and resource allocation to support evidence-based trauma system optimization.

Indexed as

Geriatric AssessmentTrauma CentersWounds and InjuriesAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleGermanyGlasgow Coma ScaleHospital MortalityHumansInjury Severity ScoreMaleRegistriesRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentGeriatric modifier emergency medicineGeriatric patientGeriatric traumaGuidelineTrauma team activationUndertriage

Identifiers

PMID42277933
PMCPMC13261963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.