Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42277904›Full record

ArticleTrials2026

From pilot to region-wide impact: study protocol for an implementation study and randomised controlled trial of the LEX LOTSEN OWL Care and Case Management System.

Matthias Arnold, Sonja Gscheidle, Saskia Lange, Malte Haring, Elmar Stegmeier, Helena Klampfleitner, Clarissa Kurscheid, Marie Schluttig, Uwe Borchers, Susanne Stampa and 6 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Matthias ArnoldInav GmbH, Berlin, Germany. arnold@inav-berlin.de.
Sonja GscheidleInav GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Saskia LangeInav GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Malte HaringInav GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Elmar StegmeierSocial Impactor GbR, Aschau im Chiemgau, Germany.
Helena KlampfleitnerSocial Impactor GbR, Aschau im Chiemgau, Germany.
Clarissa KurscheidFigus GmbH, Cologne, Germany.
Marie SchluttigFigus GmbH, Cologne, Germany.
Uwe BorchersZIG OWL, Bielefeld, Germany.
Susanne StampaZIG OWL, Bielefeld, Germany.
Jan Hendrik SchneckeZIG OWL, Bielefeld, Germany.
Andreas von SchellHELP GmbH, Wennigsen, Germany.
Rebecca PriesStiftung Deutsche Schlaganfall-Hilfe, Gütersloh, Germany.
Johannes MietheStiftung Deutsche Schlaganfall-Hilfe, Gütersloh, Germany.
Georg GalleStiftung Deutsche Schlaganfall-Hilfe, Gütersloh, Germany.
Michael BrinkmeierStiftung Deutsche Schlaganfall-Hilfe, Gütersloh, Germany.

Funding

Joint Federal Committee of the Federal Republic of Germany 01NVF22116
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCare and case management (CCM) is considered a promising approach to bridging gaps in cross-sectoral coordination for high-need patients, aiming to improve access, continuity, and overall care experiences. Despite promising pilot initiatives, comprehensive models that investigate both the "how" (implementation and sustainable scaling) and the "what" (patient outcomes) are lacking. To address this gap, the "LEX LOTSEN OWL" (LLO) project (registered under DRKS00034188) employs a hybrid study design, combining implementation research with a classic randomized controlled trial (RCT) across seven districts in the German East Westphalia-Lippe (Ostwestfalen-Lippe, OWL) region. By examining governance structures and organizational frameworks, LLO seeks to provide insights into the broader applicability and feasibility of CCM programs. METHODS/

designThis study encompasses two interlinked components: (1) Implementation research via a process evaluation framework accompanying the establishment of "CCM offices" (Lotsenbüros) in seven districts, introduced in a staggered manner. Qualitative and quantitative methods (including interviews, document analysis, and process metrics) will be applied to identify facilitating factors and barriers, guided by a governance framework and rapid ethnographic assessments. (2) Outcome research via RCT at the patient level. Adults with complex care needs will be randomized into a care and case management group or a control group receiving usual care. The primary endpoints are relational coordination (system level), which is assessed via the Gittell Relational Coordination Questionnaire, and experienced quality of care (Patient Experience of Integrated Care Scale, PEICS). The secondary endpoints include (re)hospitalization, mortality, health-related quality of life, patient self-management, and caregiver self-efficacy, allowing a comprehensive assessment of clinical and patient-centered outcomes. DISCUSSION: This dual design aims to generate evidence of both structural and process-related factors influencing implementation while evaluating the potential clinical effectiveness of CCM. The results may inform how an indication-independent CCM can be seamlessly integrated into diverse healthcare settings. By providing insights into governance, organizational strategies, and patient-specific benefits, LLO may inform future policy and practice, foster improved coordination, enhance continuity, and increase patient engagement in routine health systems. Additionally, the project explores scalability factors critical for decision-makers. Collectively, this initiative has the potential to contribute to the development of sustainable, patient-centered care models.

trial registrationThis study is prospectively registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS, DRKS00034188 ) on 17 May 2024.

Indexed as

Case ManagementDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedGermanyHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicPilot ProjectsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignCare and case managementCare and case managersImplementation researchIntegrated careMixed methodsOutcome evaluationRelational coordination

Identifiers

PMID42277904
PMCPMC13255438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.