Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42277897›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2026

Feasibility of evaluating the effectiveness of an interprofessional rehabilitation program for people with chronic low back pain in Ethiopia: a pilot randomized control trial protocol.

Sintayehu Daba Wami, Catherine Donnelly, Kassahun Alemu, Esayas Adefris, Jordan Miller

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05866146 (A Pilot Randomized Control Trial to Test the Feasibility of Evaluating the Effectiveness of an Interprofessional Rehabilitation Program for Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain in Ethiopia), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05866146 nacompletednot on this map

A Pilot Randomized Control Trial to Test the Feasibility of Evaluating the Effectiveness of an Interprofessional Rehabilitation Program for Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain in Ethiopia: A Study Protocol

TypeinterventionalSponsorSintayehu WamiRan2023 to 2023Enrolled40ConditionsChronic Low-back PainArmsInterprofessional rehabilitation program, Usual standard care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sintayehu Daba WamiSchool of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada. sintayehudaba2004@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5415-1750
Catherine DonnellySchool of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.
Kassahun AlemuDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Esayas AdefrisDepartment of Surgery, School of Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Jordan MillerSchool of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic low back pain (CLBP) is a significant public health problem and the leading cause of years lived with disability globally. Evidence suggests that interprofessional rehabilitation programs are effective for people with CLBP in improving health-related quality of life, reducing pain, and improving function and work abilities for people with CLBP. So far, however, little attention has been given to interprofessional rehabilitation programs for people with CLBP in low- and middle-income countries. Hence, this pilot randomized control trial (RCT) aims to evaluate the feasibility of conducting a future fully powered RCT to assess the effectiveness of an interprofessional rehabilitation program compared to the usual care for people with CLBP in Ethiopia.

methodsA two-arm parallel pilot RCT, with embedded mixed methods process evaluation, will be employed. A total of 40 patients with CLBP will be randomly assigned to the intervention and control groups at a 1:1 ratio. Participants of the intervention group will receive interprofessional rehabilitation that contains progressive physical activity and exercise, pain education, psychological interventions, and task-oriented and ergonomic interventions components. The comparison group participants will receive usual care for the same 4-week period. The primary outcome will be the feasibility of trial procedures (recruitment rate, retention rate, adherence rate, and acceptability of intervention). Secondary outcomes include the outcomes planned for the full trial, including physical functioning, pain intensity, pain self-efficacy, and health-related quality of life. Results will be analyzed and reported using descriptive statistics. The process evaluation will include a fidelity checklist, adherence measures, and qualitative interviews with 10 patients and all care providers involved to understand their experiences, barriers, and facilitators to implementing the intervention and trial methods with the goal of refining the intervention and trial methods in preparation for the fully powered trial. DISCUSSION: This pilot RCT will be critical to informing the methods, minimizing uncertainties, and increasing the likelihood of successfully conducting a definitive RCT in the future. In addition, it provides a source of evidence for other initiatives aimed at developing and implementing interprofessional rehabilitation programs in a similar context particularly in low- and middle-income countries.

trial registrationThis trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (registration number, NCT05866146, date of registration, 19th July 2023).

Indexed as

Chronic low back painFeasibilityInterprofessionalMultidisciplinaryPilot randomized controlled trialRehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID42277897
PMCPMC13479865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.