ReviewCritical care (London, England)2026
Computational tools for personalizing treatment of acute respiratory failure, from machine learning to digital twins: a narrative review.
Review in Critical care (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Patient-specific computational tools hold great promise for the development of more personalized treatment strategies for acute respiratory failure. Such tools span a continuum from data-driven predictors, to patient-specific mechanistic models, and ultimately to fully realized digital twins with continuous bidirectional model-patient interactions. Data-driven prediction models apply machine learning to large-scale patient datasets to develop tools that can help clinicians identify patients who are likely, or unlikely, to benefit from a particular course of treatment. By incorporating detailed computational representations of disease pathophysiology, patient-specific mechanistic models can provide insights into the effects of existing or novel treatment strategies, support patient stratification and treatment personalization, and enable the design of in silico clinical trials of new interventions. Finally, fully realized dynamic digital twins of patients could provide real-time decision support and 'simulate-before-treat' capabilities at the bedside, helping clinicians optimize treatment as the patient's disease state evolves. This narrative review provides an overview of recent research applying these approaches in the context of acute respiratory failure, encompassing both respiratory and ventilatory support across neonatal, paediatric and adult populations, and pre-hospital, ward and intensive care environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.