Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42277896›Full record

ReviewCritical care (London, England)2026

Computational tools for personalizing treatment of acute respiratory failure, from machine learning to digital twins: a narrative review.

Sina Saffaran, Hang Yu, Hossein Shamohammadi, Liam Weaver, William Joy, Lauren Ketteridge, Beatrice Albanese, Lukasz Regulski, Simon Becker, Don Sharkey and 10 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical care (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Sina SaffaranSchool of Engineering, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
Hang YuSchool of Engineering, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
Hossein ShamohammadiSchool of Engineering, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
Liam WeaverSchool of Engineering, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
William JoySchool of Engineering, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
Lauren KetteridgeSchool of Engineering, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
Beatrice AlbaneseSchool of Engineering, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
Lukasz RegulskiSchool of Engineering, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
Simon BeckerDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Ruhr University Bochum, BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Bochum, Germany.
Don SharkeyCentre for Perinatal Research, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
T'ng Chang KwokCentre for Perinatal Research, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Jonathan G HardmanDepartment of Anaesthesia & Critical Care, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Nadir YehyaDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Tommaso MauriDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Emergency, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Milan, Italy.
Timothy E ScottDepartment of Anaesthesia & Critical Care, University Hospital North Midlands NHS Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, UK.
Roberto TonelliDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences of Adult and Mother-Child SMECHIMAI, University of Modena Reggio-Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Enrico CliniDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences of Adult and Mother-Child SMECHIMAI, University of Modena Reggio-Emilia, Modena, Italy.
John G LaffeyAnaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Galway University Hospitals, Galway, Ireland.
Luigi CamporotaDivision of Anaesthetics, Pain Medicine, and Intensive Care (APMIC), Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK. l.camporota@imperial.ac.uk.
Declan G BatesSchool of Engineering, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK. d.bates@warwick.ac.uk.

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/W000490/1Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/Y003527/1Royal Academy of Engineering RF2122-21-258
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient-specific computational tools hold great promise for the development of more personalized treatment strategies for acute respiratory failure. Such tools span a continuum from data-driven predictors, to patient-specific mechanistic models, and ultimately to fully realized digital twins with continuous bidirectional model-patient interactions. Data-driven prediction models apply machine learning to large-scale patient datasets to develop tools that can help clinicians identify patients who are likely, or unlikely, to benefit from a particular course of treatment. By incorporating detailed computational representations of disease pathophysiology, patient-specific mechanistic models can provide insights into the effects of existing or novel treatment strategies, support patient stratification and treatment personalization, and enable the design of in silico clinical trials of new interventions. Finally, fully realized dynamic digital twins of patients could provide real-time decision support and 'simulate-before-treat' capabilities at the bedside, helping clinicians optimize treatment as the patient's disease state evolves. This narrative review provides an overview of recent research applying these approaches in the context of acute respiratory failure, encompassing both respiratory and ventilatory support across neonatal, paediatric and adult populations, and pre-hospital, ward and intensive care environments.

Indexed as

Machine LearningPrecision MedicineRespiratory InsufficiencyDigital HealthHumansPredictive Learning ModelsAcute respiratory failureComputational modellingDecision-support systemsDigital twinsMachine learningRespiratory support, mechanical ventilation

Identifiers

PMID42277896
PMCPMC13488073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.