ArticleJournal of eating disorders2026
Lived experience perspectives of receiving peer support in eating disorders.
Article in Journal of eating disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPeer support (PS) is increasingly incorporated into eating disorder services as an adjunct to clinical treatment, yet qualitative evidence exploring how it is experienced by service users remains limited. Since 2023, the Eating Disorders Unit at South London and Maudsley (SLaM) NHS Foundation Trust has piloted a 1-1 PS pathway alongside routine care.
methodsSemi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with twelve adults diagnosed with an eating disorder who had received 1-1 PS within outpatient or day care services. Interviews explored participants' subjective experiences and the perceived meaning of PS within their wider recovery journeys. Data was analysed using reflexive thematic analysis within a constructivist-interpretivist framework.
resultsSeven interrelated themes captured how participants experienced PS: relational understanding and normalisation; informality and shared power; re-positioning the eating disorder within a wider life; safety and non-judgement; imagining recovery through lived example; practical knowledge as relationally embedded; and multi-layered relatability. Participants described PS as distinct from formal treatment, valuing its relational qualities and lived-experience grounding. A commonly reported limitation concerned the time-limited nature of PS, with many participants expressing a desire for additional sessions.
conclusionsThis qualitative evaluation provides insight into how 1-1 PS is experienced within a specialist eating disorder service. Rather than evidencing effectiveness, the findings illuminate relational and meaning-making processes through which PS was perceived as helpful. These insights informed the development of an eating disorder-specific PS feedback tool and have implications for service development and future research.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.